Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Armstrong v. Martin Marietta Corp., 95-3255 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 95-3255 Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 11, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-3255 _ DAVID M. ARMSTRONG, L. BENSON BARGER, WALLACE D. BLACK, HOWARD BROOKS, JERRY A. BUDD, SONJA M. CARTER, DOMINICK C. CIZER, CAROL D. CLARK-ILEY, CHARLES H. DAVIS, KENNETH O. GIESSUEBEL, HEROLD P. GLASER, ROBERT A. HAVLISH, KUMAR HINDUJA, JOSEPH C. JETT, GLENN E. JOHNSON, ROBERT C. LERCHE, CALVIN N. LIGHTNER, GEORGE W. MCGUIRK, JAMES W. MCLEAN, WILLIAM G. MURPHY, DONALD L. PRASKY, CLARK C. RAINS, KENNETH A. RICHARDS, RUS
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 95-3255 ________________________ DAVID M. ARMSTRONG, L. BENSON BARGER, WALLACE D. BLACK, HOWARD BROOKS, JERRY A. BUDD, SONJA M. CARTER, DOMINICK C. CIZER, CAROL D. CLARK-ILEY, CHARLES H. DAVIS, KENNETH O. GIESSUEBEL, HEROLD P. GLASER, ROBERT A. HAVLISH, KUMAR HINDUJA, JOSEPH C. JETT, GLENN E. JOHNSON, ROBERT C. LERCHE, CALVIN N. LIGHTNER, GEORGE W. MCGUIRK, JAMES W. MCLEAN, WILLIAM G. MURPHY, DONALD L. PRASKY, CLARK C. RAINS, KENNETH A. RICHARDS, RUSSELL G. ROBERTS, LINDA L. RYAN, VICTOR W. SHAW, LINTON W. SMITH, MICHAEL SYLVESTRI, MARLON K. TARTER, DELBERT S. TURNER, EDWARD W. WALSH, JOSEPH W. WILLIAMSON, Plaintiffs-Appellants, CONSTANTINO A. BARBITTA, JAMES R. BAXTER, ROBERT D. BIGGS, JAMES H. BLACK, RICK L. BORDNER, RODMOND M. COOKSON, DAVID B. POOL, ROGER A. PURCELL, RAMA S. SINGH, CHARLES M. SMITH, ROBERT G. SWANSON, WILLIAM F. WALDROP, KENNETH E. WELCH, Plaintiffs, versus MARTIN MARIETTA CORP., MARTIN MARIETTA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants-Appellees. ------------------------ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ------------------------ (February 18, 1997) Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges. B Y T H E C O U R T : A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the appellees' Suggestion of Hearing En Banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor thereof, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be heard by this court sitting en banc. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer